3 views: Ideas on Move

A nonexhaustive checklist of why Marc Andreessen and Adam Neumann have misinterpret America’s housing issues

When Marc Andreessen announced that he was sinking $350 million of a16z traders’ cash into a brand new enterprise by WeWork co-founder and former CEO Adam Neumann, loads of jaws dropped. For one, there was the huge sum and equally huge valuation for an organization that, as of at this time, owns a number of thousand rental items.

Then there have been the claims that Move may assist resolve inequality, anxiousness, loneliness and a lot of different social ills. Neumann’s concepts for Move, Andreessen stated, are “not missing in imaginative and prescient or ambition, however solely initiatives with such lofty targets have an opportunity at altering the world.”

That’s idealistic rhetoric, even by the requirements of Silicon Valley.

One thing didn’t really feel proper to us. Sure, there was the Neumann issue. However there was one thing extra. Neumann and Andreessen have been attempting to denationalise the neighborhood. Right here’s why we expect that’s not such an excellent concept.

There are some issues that enterprise capital can resolve. For instance, I discover it fairly nice that I can get a experience dwelling from a vetted stranger if I’m out alone late at night time and don’t really feel comfy strolling to the subway, then transferring to a bus to get dwelling.

However therein lies the crux of the issue: What if public transportation was merely simply higher? What if I didn’t have to determine between dropping $25 on an Uber and strolling quarter-hour to the subway, standing alone underground, driving the subway, getting out, ready for the bus outdoors alone, then taking the bus dwelling at midnight?

By the identical notion, Adam Neumann’s Move needs to resolve what investor Marc Andreessen calls a housing disaster.

Source link






Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *